Sostieni il nostro comune progetto: diventa Socio e/o fai una donazione
:: Pagina iniziale | Autenticati | Registrati | Tutti gli autori | Biografie | Ricerca | Altri siti ::  :: Chi siamo | Contatti ::
:: Poesia | Aforismi | Prosa/Narrativa | Pensieri | Articoli | Saggi | Eventi | Autori proposti | Video proposti | 4 mani  :: Posta ::
:: Poesia della settimana | Recensioni | Interviste | Libri liberi [eBook] | I libri vagabondi [book crossing] ::  :: Commenti dei lettori ::
Premio letterario "Il Giardino di Babuk - Proust en Italie" - V edizione (2019)
PUBBLICATA LA CLASSIFICA FINALE | e-book del Premio | Interviste ai vincitori
 

Ogni lettore, quando legge, legge se stesso. L'opera dello scrittore è soltanto una specie di strumento ottico che egli offre al lettore per permettergli di discernere quello che, senza libro, non avrebbe forse visto in se stesso. (da "Il tempo ritrovato" - Marcel Proust)

The new license plate of John Osborne

Argomento: Letteratura

di Enzo Sardellaro
[ biografia | pagina personale | scrivi all'autore ]


[ Raccogli tutti gli articoli dell'autore in una sola pagina ]

« indietro | stampa | invia ad un amico »
# 1 commenti: Leggi | Commenta » | commenta con il testo a fronte »




Pubblicato il 16/05/2016 18:56:11

When John Osborne gained great popularity  by means of his “Look Back in Anger,” he changed the license plate on  his sports car, showing a good sense of humor.  It read: “A.Y.M” (1). What happened to Osborne?  Was he  going mad perhaps? No. Osborne was completely clearly understanding,  that he represented  an icon of the “anger” of  young   people who projected   themselves into the fictional creation that were   the Angry (A.) Young (Y.) Men (M.), of whose world  Osborne had  become the guru or prophet.

 

As many writers of success, Osborn (born in 1929, the son of working-class parents) failed at school that he left at fifteen, before trying  his hand at journalism and then becoming  known as both actor and  playwright . Sports car  and the theatre made the fortune of Osborne, because he started the “New Wave” of English Drama thanks to his hero, Jim (or Jimmy)  Porter, a university graduate of about 25, who was a bitter failure in a  “cruel” and  “unjust” society.

 

When “Look Back in Anger”  was first played at the Royal Court Theatre in 1956, Osborne obtained a checkmate, simply because the Royal Theatre in Chelsea was the home  of all the beatniks who “soon” recognized themselves in the frustrated disillusioned and “angry” Jim Porter. Jim Porter, alias John Osborn, has a university degree, “but” refuses to accept a job in which he will have to behave as a middle-class or upper-class man, and makes a living by selling things from a barrow in the market. Jim is extremely discontent and irritable and bad character is made still worse by Alison’s aristocratic self-control. The other characters of the play  are Cliff, a friend who lives in another room in the house, and Miss Drury, their landlady who lives below them.

The house becomes a  “mad-house,” and a real “zoo” where all cried.

Alison- Look out, for Heaven’s sake! Oh, it’s more like a zoo every day!

Jimmy- Darling I’m sorry.

Alison- Get out!                                                                                                       

Jimmy- I’m sorry, believe me

Alison (to Cliff)- Where is he?

Cliff- In my room.

Alison- What’s he doing?

Cliff- Lying on the bed. Reading, I think (Look Back in Anger).

While we are waiting for  the “rude” awakening of Jim, we would simply underline that  “Look Back in Anger”  scored a tremendous success in 1956 as it interpreted the frustration and anger of the younger generations in the 50’s. Jim Porter, the hero, became  a symbol of the vague aspirations of dissatisfied young people and their protest against Establishment. One day someone asked  Alberto Moravia about the British Establishment in the 50’s.   “But what is the so-called British ‘establishment’? It is the Court, the abuses of the powerful, the State […] In Italy the establishment is the  Italian State, the Church, and  the  monopoly in industry” (2).

 

But who were the  Angry Young Men  “really”? Kenneth Allsop was no soft or tender with them: “The larger result is that the new dissentients feel unassimilated […] The go-getter is no new type, either to society or fiction, but the difference in the post-war model is that, although driven by ambition, envy and greed […], he has no admiration or liking for the class he is gatecrashing.  He wants its advantages and privileges, but […] he has no wish to be assimilated. […]” (3). In conclusion, according to Kenneth Allsop,  the A. Y. M. were insignificant  social climbers. Maybe Kenneth  Allsop had been  too harsh in his judgment of  Osborne , but it is a fact that John Osborne drove a sports car (including a Bentley and a Cadillac) and not a mini-car in the mid 50's:

 

“Osborne would own a few cars in his time, including a Bentley and a Cadillac” (4).

 

                                                                                                                                     

Works Cited

 

1)            “With the proceeds of this success Osborne bought his first car. When the license plates arrived they bore the initials A.Y.M.” ( see Alan Carter, “John Osborne”: Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd, 1973, p. 12).

2)            From an interview with Moravia  in “L'Espresso,”  October 20, 1963.

3)            Kenneth  Allsop, “The Angry Decade,”  London, Peter Owen Limited, 1958, p. 27.

4)            John Heilpern, “ John Osborne: A Patriot for Us,”  Chatto & Windus, 2006,  p. 152. With regard to this, Dan Rebellato tells us a funny story: “At the end of Osborne’s 1960 television play, A subject of the Scandal and Concern, the narrator signs off sardonically suggesting that the audience may all be  waiting for the adverts. ‘That’s all. You may retire now. And if a mini-car is your particular mini-dream, then dream it’ (Presumably the sports car Osborne brought with the fists profits of Look Back in Anger was a maxi-dream)” ( See Dan Rebellato, “1956 and All That: The Making of Modern British Drama”: London, Routledge, 1999,  p. 33).

 

 

 


« indietro | stampa | invia ad un amico »
# 1 commenti: Leggi | Commenta » | commenta con il testo a fronte »

 

Di seguito trovi le ultime pubblicazioni dell'autore in questa sezione (max 10)
[se vuoi leggere di più vai alla pagina personale dell'autore »]

Enzo Sardellaro, nella sezione Articolo, ha pubblicato anche:

:: [ Letteratura ] The melancholy trajectory of Joe Lampton (Pubblicato il 16/02/2016 20:20:47 - visite: 586) »

:: [ Letteratura ] Nota su the Crucible, di Miller (Pubblicato il 16/02/2016 14:12:49 - visite: 639) »

:: [ Letteratura ] “Furori americani”. Da John Ford a William Faulkner (Pubblicato il 18/01/2015 20:07:41 - visite: 828) »

:: [ Storia ] “L’Italia delle crisi” e gli economisti (Pubblicato il 23/12/2014 20:19:52 - visite: 846) »

:: [ Storia ] Dai fondi del Piano Marshall ai fondi europei (Pubblicato il 07/12/2014 19:28:04 - visite: 831) »

:: [ Storia ] Il “popolo schiavo” e la congiura dei Pazzi (Pubblicato il 29/11/2014 16:01:52 - visite: 942) »

:: [ Letteratura ] Ignazio Silone: Nostro Contemporaneo (Pubblicato il 28/11/2014 10:23:25 - visite: 667) »

:: [ Natura ] Diseconomie industriali (Pubblicato il 15/11/2014 18:36:01 - visite: 845) »

:: [ Politica ] Tra storia e polemica: il Senato della Repubblica (Pubblicato il 22/07/2014 18:52:40 - visite: 849) »

:: [ Turismo ] Italian Beautiful Places : The Lake of Como (Pubblicato il 05/07/2014 13:57:52 - visite: 793) »